|
Post by Tony Crispino on Dec 20, 2013 22:18:33 GMT -8
Just reporting... The investigators concluded, “Reporting of adverse events in oncology publications of randomized trials is suboptimal and characterized by substantial selectivity and heterogeneity. The development of oncology-specific standards for adverse event reporting should be established to ensure consistency and provide critical information required for medical decision-making.” Asco Wire
Key Points: Studies had a median completeness score of 8, out of 14. Lack of specified funding source and earlier year of publication were significantly associated with lower completeness scores.
|
|
|
Post by CedarChopper on Dec 21, 2013 4:37:02 GMT -8
In statistical data, giving a mean (or heaven forbid the almost always intentionally mis-leading "median") without a statistical variance cannot be discerned from hysteria. As my dear ol' Daddy always said, "Figures don't lie but liars figure." As noted, posting an outlier - often from data with little if any "statistical significance" - publishing an outlier as a research conclusion is reckless. As my dear ol' Daddy always said "Any jackass can kick down a barn. It takes a Hiram to build a Temple." Thanks for Keeping Watch TCLasVegas! Cedar
|
|